Intracystic Papillary Carcinoma: A Case Report.

Intracystic papillary carcinoma (IPC) of the breast is a rare form of in-situ carcinoma, which is contained within a dilated duct. Mammography and ultrasound may provide clues to its presence, but formal diagnosis always requires histologic evidence. Although IPC is associated with an excellent prognosis, surgical resection is important in order to rule out the possibility of any invasive component, which would result in the need for more aggressive treatment. In this paper, we review the radiographic and histologic features of this interesting diagnosis, present a patient case, and explore the possible reason why IPC does not require the same treatment modalities as the more common ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).

Contribution of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and ADC Values to Papillary Breast Lesions.

This study aimed to evaluate the role of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values obtained from diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in the differentiation of malignant from benign papillary breast lesions. The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data of 94 breast papillary lesions confirmed by pathology were retrospectively analyzed. The differences in ADC values of papillary lesions under different enhancements in MRI and different pathological types were investigated, and the ADC threshold was determined by the receiver operating characteristic curve for its potential diagnostic value. The mean ADC values in borderline and malignant lesions (1.01 ± 0.20 × 10-3 mm2/s) were significantly lower compared to benign lesions (1.21 ± 0.27 × 10-3 mm2/s) (P < 0.05). The optimal threshold of the ADC value could be 1.00 × 10-3 mm2/s. The ADC values were statistically significant in differentiating between benign and malignant papillary lesions whether in mass or non-mass enhancement (P < 0.05). However, there were no statistical differences in the ADC values among borderline or any other histological subtypes of malignant lesions (P > 0.05). Measuring ADC values from DWI can be used to identify benign and malignant breast papillary lesions. The diagnostic performance of the ADC value in identifying benign and malignant breast lesions is not affected by the way of lesion enhancement. However, it shows no use for differential diagnosis among malignant lesion subtypes for now. The ADC value of 1.00 × 10-3 mm2/s can be used as the most appropriate threshold for distinguishing between benign and malignant breast papillary lesions.

Nueva clasificación de las lesiones papilares de la mama incluidas en la quinta actualización (2019) de la clasificación OMS de tumores de la mama / New classification of papillary breast lesions included in the fifth update (2019) of the WHO classification of breast tumors / Nova classificação das lesões papilares da mama incluídas na quinta atualização (2019) da classificação OMS de tumores da mama

En el más reciente número de esta revista se publicó el estudio titulado "Lesiones papilares de mama: estudio clínico-patológico y sobrepronóstico en 144 casos de Medellín, Colombia", donde se hace un excelente acercamiento sobre este tipo de lesiones. Se conoce que las lesiones papilares de la mama son entidades poco frecuentes en la práctica cotidiana, con una representación del 10% de las entidades benignas y solo un 1% de las entidades malignas. Su manifestación clínica habitual es la secreción serosanguinolenta, unilateral, sin masas palpables y en los estudios de imagen suelen mostrarse como lesiones únicas o múltiples de localización retroareolar. El diagnostico anatomopatologico no es sencillo en estudios por punción, bien sea con aguja fina o por aguja gruesa y, por lo general, se requiere de la escisión de la lesión para obtener un diagnóstico más certero.

Papillary Lesions of the Breast: Addition of DWI and TIRM Sequences to Routine Breast MRI Could Help in Differentiation Benign from Malignant.

AIM: We aimed to investigate the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of benign, atypical, or malignant papillary breast lesions and to assess the additional value of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and turbo inversion recovery magnitude (TIRM) sequences to routine breast MRI. BACKGROUND: Differentiation between benign and malignant papillary breast lesions is essential for patient management. However, morphologic features and enhancement patterns of malignant papillary lesions may overlap with those of benign papilloma. METHODS: Seventy-two papillary breast lesions (50 benign, 22 atypical or malignant) were included in the current study, retrospectively. We divided the patients into two groups: benign papillary breast lesions and atypical or malignant papillary breast lesions. Morphologic, dynamic, turbo inversion recovery magnitude (TIRM) values and diffusion features of the papillary lesions were compared between two groups. RESULTS: Benign papillary lesions were smaller in size (p=0.006 and p=0.005, for radiologists 1 and 2 respectively), closer to the areola (p=0.045 and 0.049 for radiologist 1 and 2 respectively), and had higher ADC values (p=0.001 for two radiologists) than the atypical or malignant group. ROC curves showed diagnostic accuracy for ADC (AUC=0.770 and 0.762, p = 0.0001 for two radiologists), and showed a cut-off value of ≤ 957 x 10-6 mm2/s (radiologist 1) and ≤ 910 x 10-6 mm2/s (radiologist 2). CONCLUSION: MRI is a useful method for differentiation between benign and malignant papillary breast lesions. Centrally located, lesser in size, and higher ADC values should be considered benign, whereas peripherally located, larger in size, and lower ADC values should be considered malignant.

Spectrum of Papillary Breast Lesions According to World Health Organization Classification of Papillary Neoplasms of Breast.

Introduction Papillary breast lesions are segregated into benign and malignant based on the presence or absence of myoepithelial cells in the papillary cores. Papillary breast lesions are further classified into: intraductal papilloma, papilloma with atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH)/ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), papillary DCIS, solid papillary carcinoma in situ, solid papillary carcinoma with invasion, invasive solid papillary carcinoma, encapsulated papillary carcinoma and encapsulated papillary carcinoma with invasion. In this study, we evaluated the spectrum of papillary breast lesions in resection specimens of the breast according to the latest World Health Organization (WHO) classification of breast tumors. Methods This was a retrospective cross-sectional study, and was conducted at Liaquat National Hospital for a period of six years, from January 2012 till December 2017. Data of patients that underwent surgeries for breast tumors were included in the study. All specimens were grossed, according to defined protocols, and representative sections were taken after inking resection margins. Hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections were examined by experienced histopathologists, and myoepithelial stains (p63 and myosin) were done in selected sections of all tumors. Histopathological classification of papillary tumors was performed according to WHO classification of breast tumors. Results The study involved 190 excision specimens of papillary breast lesions. Mean age of the patients was 45.6±17.1 years. Most of the lesions were between two and five centimetres (69.1%). For invasive carcinomas (n = 76), the most frequent grade was II (52.6%). For in situ and invasive carcinomas (n = 129), lymphovascular invasion and axillary metastasis were noted in 5.4% and 9.3% cases, respectively. Among papillary breast lesions, 36.8% were benign (intraductal papilloma, solitary or multiple) while 63.2% harbored ADH, DCIS, or invasive carcinoma. Invasive papillary carcinoma was the most frequent malignant papillary lesion (20%), followed by solid papillary carcinoma with invasion (12.6%). We found significant associations between patient's age and tumor size with histological type of papillary lesion as benign papillary lesions had smaller size and younger age compared to malignant papillary lesions. Conclusion We noted a high frequency of malignancy in papillary breast lesions. Moreover, malignant papillary lesions were significantly associated with higher age and larger tumor size.

How Do We Approach Benign Proliferative Lesions?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The aim of this review is to summarize recently published literature addressing atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), lobular neoplasia (atypical lobular hyperplasia [ALH] and classic lobular carcinoma in situ [C-LCIS]), non-classic lobular carcinoma in situ (NC-LCIS), papillary lesions, and flat epithelial atypia (FEA). RECENT FINDINGS: While ADH, ALN, and C-LCIS are well-established markers of an increased risk of future breast cancers, the risk implications are less clear for papillary lesions and FEA. NC-LCIS is the least well-characterized lesion, with scant published literature on its natural history and surgical management when encountered on needle biopsy. Recent data suggest that lobular neoplasia on core biopsy of a BI-RADS ≤ 4 concordant lesion does not require an excision, while ADH, atypical papillomas, and NC-LCIS should be excised. Evidence on FEA and papillomas without atypia suggests a low risk of upgrade on excision, and prospective studies on the upgrade of these lesions are ongoing.

[Benign proliferative breast disease with and without atypia]. / Prise en charge des proliférations épithéliales du sein avec et sans atypies : hyperplasie canalaire atypique, métaplasie cylindrique avec atypie, néoplasies lobulaires, proliférations épithéliales sans atypie, mastopathie fibrokystique, adénose, cicatrices radiaires, mucocèles, lésions prolifératives apocrines : recommandations pour la pratique clinique.

In the last few years, diagnostics of high-risk breast lesions (atypical ductal hyperplasia [ADH], flat epithelial atypia [FEA], lobular neoplasia: atypical lobular hyperplasia [ALH], lobular carcinoma in situ [LCIS], radial scar [RS], usual ductal hyperplasia [UDH], adenosis, sclerosing adenosis [SA], papillary breast lesions, mucocele-like lesion [MLL]) have increased with the growing number of breast percutaneous biopsies. The management of these lesions is highly conditioned by the enlarged risk of breast cancer combined with either an increased probability of finding cancer after surgery, either a possible malignant transformation (in situ or invasive cancer), or an increased probability of developing cancer on the long range. An overview of the literature reports grade C recommendations concerning the management and follow-up of these lesions: in case of ADH, FEA, ALH, LCIS, RS, MLL with atypia, diagnosed on percutaneous biopsies: surgical excision is recommended; in case of a diagnostic based on vacuum-assisted core biopsy with complete disappearance of radiological signal for FEA or RS without atypia: surgical abstention is a valid alternative approved by multidisciplinary meeting. In case of ALH (incidental finding) associated with benign lesion responsible of radiological signal: abstention may be proposed; in case of UDH, adenosis, MLL without atypia, diagnosed on percutaneous biopsies: the concordance of radiology and histopathology findings must be ensured. No data is available to recommend surgery; in case of non-in sano resection for ADH, FEA, ALH, LCIS (except pleomorphic type), RS, MLL: surgery does not seem to be necessary; in case of previous ADH, ALH, LCIS: a specific follow-up is recommended in accordance with HAS's recommendations. In case of FEA and RS or MLL combined with atypia, little data are yet available to differ the management from others lesions with atypia; in case of UDH, usual sclerosing adenosis, RS without atypia, fibro cystic disease: no specific follow-up is recommended in agreement with HAS's recommendations.

[Breast surgeon role in the management of high-risk breast lesions]. / Quelle prise en charge chirurgicale pour "les lésions à haut risque" de cancer du sein?

Diagnostics of high-risk breast lesions have increased these last years with the augmentation of breast percutaneous biopsies. They are lesions that confer an enlarged risk of breast cancer, either because of an increased probability of finding cancer after open surgery, a possible evolution toward in situ or invasive cancer, or because of an increased probability of developing breast cancer over the long term. Much progress has been made these last years in their histological diagnostic, classification and pathogenesis. Nevertheless, no consensus exists to date on the management of these "high-risk" lesions. In particular, surgical indications and follow-up modalities remain controversial for each histological type. In this review, the principal factors that could impact surgical decision and long-term follow-up are discussed with areas of controversy highlighted.

Clinical Characteristics of the Diagnosis and Treatment in Patients with Papillary Lesions of the Breast

BACKGROUND: Papillary lesions of the breast exhibit bloody nipple discharge, often with no evidence of a palpable tumor. These lesions occasionally present some difficult diagnostic and therapeutic problems as they may be histologically benign, borderline or malignant. The types of surgery should be selected according to the different lesion characteristics. A favorable result of appropriate surgery is no recurrence. METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective study of 60 patients treated for the papillary lesions of the breast over the period from January 1990 to July 1998 at Inje University Pusan Paik Hospital. The study examined clinical characteristics by comparative analysis of clinical features, diagnostic methods (mammogram, ultrasound, galactogram & fine needle aspiration cytology) and surgical procedures among the various types of papillary lesions of the breast diagnosed histologically. RESULTS: The patients with a papillary carcinoma or papillomatosis were all older than the mean age of 45 for the 60 patients. Nipple discharges were most frequent in multiple central papilloma patients & intraductal papilloma patients. The incidence of nipple discharge alone was 26.1% in intraductal papilloma patients. Palpable masses were most frequent in the patients with a papillary carcinoma, intraductal papilloma, or papillomatosis. Ultrasound and galactograms had the highest sensitivity (90.9%, 87.5%) in all the patients with papillary lesions. Galactograms had the highest sensitivity (89%) in the patients with nipple discharge alone. The diagnostic methods with the highest sensitivity according to the type of papillary lesion were the galactogram (84.6%) for intraductal papillomas; ultrasound (100%) for multiple central papillomas; galactogram (100%), ultrasound (100%), and FNAC (100%) in papillomatosis; and the mammogram (100%) and ultrasound (100%) for papillary carcinomas. Breast cancers (DCIS, ipsilateral/contralateral invasive ductal carcinoma, papillary carcinoma) or ADH were associated with 14 cases (23.3%) of papillary lesions of the breast, in particular, 8 cases (42.1%) of papillomatosis. The most common surgical procedures were excisional biopsies & microdochectomies for intraductal papillomas, microdochectomies for multiple central papillomas, excisional biopsies & major duct excisions for papillomatosis, and mastectomies for papillary carcinomas. The incidence of postsurgical residual lesions and the recurrence were 10% & 1.7% in all the patients with papillary lesions of the breast, and were especially high in patients with papillomatosis. CONCLUSIONS: 1) Ultrasonography & galactography seem to be the most useful diagnostic methods for papillary lesions of the breast. 2) Major duct excision is recommended as an effective treatment for papillomatosis.